Beyond Extremism: What the Case of Man Haron Monis Teaches Us About Radicalisation

In the complex discourse of terrorism and violent extremism, the case of Man Haron Monis—the perpetrator of the 2014 Sydney Lindt Café siege—stands out not for its ideological clarity, but for its psychological opacity. Contrary to popular belief and initial media portrayals, Monis was not a deeply committed jihadist nor mentally ill in a clinical sense. Instead, his trajectory toward violence challenges some of the most dominant theories of radicalisation.

Traditional models often centre on increasing ideological commitment, especially to Salafist-jihadist beliefs. However, Monis had no genuine connection to ISIS or any terrorist organisation. His religious identity was largely performative, marked by inconsistent engagement and rejected by the broader Islamic community. He lacked even basic doctrinal knowledge and famously had to request an ISIS flag during the siege—hardly the hallmark of a true ideological operative.

Contrary to the Coroner’s initial findings, which suggested a sharp increase in Monis’s religious extremism, later analyses show he had no meaningful ties to Salafist ideology or terrorist networks. He was not a practicing Sunni extremist. In fact, his religious identity was fluid, performative, and discredited by the broader Muslim community. He had no operational connections with ISIS and left no martyrdom message or video, hallmarks of ideologically driven attacks (Scott & Shanahan, 2018; NSW Coroner’s Inquest, 2017).

This disconnect between ideological rhetoric and lived belief aligns with McCauley and Moskalenko’s “Friction Theory” (2011), which posits that radicalisation often emerges from personal grievances, not ideological evolution. Ideology, in such cases, is a tool of justification—not a source of transformation.

Psychological Vulnerabilities and Lone Actor Typologies

Monis fits the profile of what scholars such as Spaaij (2010) and Borum (2014) identify as a volatile lone actor: an individual driven more by narcissistic rage, personal loss, and grievance-fuelled revenge than by theological depth. His radicalisation was sporadic and impulsive. He fluctuated between attention-seeking protests and superficial engagement with Islamist symbols, all while navigating criminal charges, public shame, and profound social isolation.

Psychiatric evidence presented during the inquest supported this view, identifying antisocial, narcissistic, and paranoid features consistent with a severe personality disorder—though not psychosis. According to Borum (2014), such individuals often externalise blame, perceive persecution, and display grandiose self-concepts—conditions ripe for grievance-driven violence.

The Role of Symbolic Violence and Status Seeking

Monis’s siege location—directly across from Channel 7, an organisation he had long harassed—underscored his desire for attention, legacy, and media amplification. This aligns with Moghaddam’s (2005) “Staircase to Terrorism” model, where feelings of injustice and exclusion drive individuals up a metaphorical staircase toward violence, often culminating in a desire to “correct” perceived societal wrongs through symbolic acts.

His final social media posts were cloaked in global jihadist language—yet remained vague and inconsistent. This reflects what Trip et al. (2019) describe as "pseudo-ideological anchoring", where ideology serves as a scaffolding to moralise or legitimise personal acts of violence.

Why Monis Matters

Monis’s case is not merely an isolated incident or an outlier in the broader context of terrorism; rather, it serves as a critical warning sign that compels us to reevaluate our understanding of the factors that can lead individuals to commit acts of violence. This case illustrates that the motivations for terrorism are multifaceted and cannot be solely attributed to ideological radicalization. Instead, it highlights the significant roles that psychological predispositions, personal loss, and social alienation can play in driving individuals toward violent behavior.

Research conducted by Doosje et al. (2016) and other scholars underscores the complexity of these motivations, emphasizing that they often intertwine in intricate ways. For instance, an individual may experience a profound sense of disconnection from their community, which can exacerbate feelings of loneliness and despair. This social alienation can create a fertile ground for radical ideas to take root, as those who feel marginalized may be more susceptible to extremist narratives that promise a sense of belonging or purpose.

Furthermore, personal loss, such as the death of a loved one, a significant life change, or experiences of trauma, can also act as a powerful catalyst for violent behavior. Individuals grappling with grief or unresolved emotional pain may seek out outlets for their anger and frustration, and in some cases, this can lead to the adoption of violent ideologies as a means of expressing their turmoil.

In light of these insights, it becomes increasingly clear that deradicalisation and prevention efforts must adopt a holistic approach that encompasses a range of factors influencing an individual's path toward extremism. This means that interventions should not only focus on challenging harmful beliefs and ideologies but also on fostering a sense of belonging and community. Addressing identity issues, understanding the psychological underpinnings of violence, and recognising the political contexts in which individuals operate are all essential components of an effective strategy.

Borum, R. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1

Borum, R. (2014). Psychological vulnerabilities and propensities for involvement in violent extremism. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2110

Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F. M., Kruglanski, A. W., de Wolf, A., Mann, L., & Feddes, A. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008

Hashim, A. S. (2014). The Islamic State: From Al-Qaeda affiliate to caliphate. Middle East Policy, 21(4), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12096

Kampmark, B. (2017). Releasing the “terror genie”: Man Haron Monis and the “Sydney Siege.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 37(4), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2017.1399601

Karagiannis, E. (2010). Political Islam in Central Asia: The challenge of Hizb Ut-Tahrir. CTC Sentinel, 3(2), 13–15.

Lindekilde, L., Bertelsen, P., & Stohl, M. (2017). Radicalization patterns and modes of attack planning and preparation among lone-actor terrorists: An exploratory analysis. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 9(2), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2017.1407814

McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2011). Friction: How radicalization happens to them and us. Oxford University Press.

Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.161

Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2011). The psychology of lone-wolf terrorism. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2011.581835

Scott, R., & Shanahan, R. (2018). Man Haron Monis and the Sydney Lindt Café siege – Not a terrorist attack. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(6), 839–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1479941

Spaaij, R. (2010). The enigma of lone wolf terrorism: An assessment. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(9), 854–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501426

Trip, S., Cândea, D. M., & Salagean, N. (2019). Psychological mechanisms involved in radicalization and extremism: A rational emotive behavioral conceptualization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00437

NSW Coroner. (2017). Inquest into the deaths arising from the Lindt Café Siege: Findings and recommendations. Sydney: State Coroner’s Court of NSW.https://www.coroners.nsw.gov.au